'Throttled, stabbed in the arm and denied a bedpan'

BEST.HEADLINE. EVAH (IDST)

'They are my breasts!'

This is making my dreary afternoon fly by!

tis making me think of a certain michael_winner
....

You don't believe any of it, do you? It's the unlikliness that amuses me and I don't even like Macca than much.

They're not ones for keeping themselves out of the public eye, are they?

Either way, one of them's horrible, because that is a horrible thing to pretend that someone has done, and a horrible thing to do to someone else, so if she's fibbing or telling the truth one of them is horrible.

Yoinks. And you know that noone's going to believe her, whether or not it's true. All very sad for their kid innit.

i know! i'm torn. obv i am a crazy paul fan, i can't believe her. but to make something up that is *that* bizarre would be idiotic, wouldn't it?

she must have been talking to that woman wot made up the claim she was kidnapped and held hostage by Michael Jackson in spite of the indisputable evidence of her repeatedly going out on her own and returning to his house when she had the chance to flee or at least to tell someone, but didn't ;-)

some people will say anything, especially when they think they could get hundreds of millions in a payout...

well, I didn't know you wanted to keep on thinking there was any truth in it!

maybe Paul introduced her to Heather... ahem.

I don't like either of them but I'm disgusted that all this is in the papers. It's not even interesting!
There's not a shred of dignity in that woman's body.

What fabrications! She hasn't got a leg to stand on!

On her birthday, Macca bought Heather a plane.

And a razor for her other leg.

'Beatle Revealed As Wife-Beater, Not Actually John This Time' shock! Likely the couple argued plenty (they're divorcing, right?) and there's probably shards of truth here and there in this story, but "FORCING HER TO CRAWL" and grabbing her by the neck and crap? Paul McCartney? I don't buy it.

Heather Mills is an unbalanced woman

the gloves are off

I meant, mentally unbalanced 0:-)

that first reply is amusing. drunken posts are the best

to prove that there's no such thing as bad publicity, I put on a Beatles album two nights ago, for the first time in a while.

then the first Macca vocal starts off about a male's violence against a female, with no condemnation.

oh dear.

can you guess which album I put on?!

you are a better Beatles fan than you are a Manicsfan ;-p


don't get me started on that newspaper article I saw yesterday...

gah, i'm RUBBISH!

MACCA'S HALO SLIPS AS MILLS SINGS THE BLUES
by Fionnuala O'Leary (Evening Herald, 20-10-06)





I think the "journalist" is using the (usually) reasonable argument that such claims should be investigated, to gossip about someone in the public eye, knowing it will sell, considering who that person is. Should every claim against someone be in the public domain, for the tabloids to dissect (for their own profits), before anyone gets anywhere as to the validity of the accusations? Do innocent people not have the right not to have their good name slurred as well?

Heather's supposed claims are, in my opinion, as clearly bogus as yer woman who was living it up in Neverland before being told it was time to leave. As for the headline; I don't buy into all this Saint Paul crap (or Jesus McCartney, as someone called him on Teletext the other day), so, I don't think he has a halo, metaphorically speaking or not. I reckon, the heading used is one which implies that Paul is likely guilty of something, by saying his halo has slipped. So, like, read on, readers.

"Divorcing one of the best loved faces in music history was never going to be an easy battle for Mills." God love her and her struggles to secure a multi-million pound divorce settlement! "Plenty of men who are charismatic and charming to the outside world have fallen down when it comes to the behind the closed door treatment of their partners." Fine, use that to tar everyone with the same 'woman beater' brush.

I hate newspapers...

yeah, like I said, I've never thought of him as saintly (just a bit of a sap, compared to John ;-p), and he may well not be so angelic when he's had a few drinks, but some of those claims seem more than a bit far fetched. Someone with an over-active, but not very good imagination, when it comes to making up claims, is behind it, I reckon.

there could be worse articles about, too... I've not read anything else, although I was told of something in one that said something about comments in a book Mills brought out that contradict one of her claims..?

I don't see anything about it in the article you link to, above... but, something like, she said she gets up half an hour earlier than him every morning to exercise (in the book)... and the claim is, what, that he wouldn't let her get out of bed

which means she's lying in one or both instances, or, if not, it won't look good for her credibility in a court case, anyway

and why does no one mention that she goes around trying to look like a saint as well? ;-)

oh dear, if it's in the NOTW, it must be lies ;-p

they pick a flattering photo of him...

only comment I have to make on all that is:

LIE THREE: Heather claims that on Long Island in August, 2003, she asked Paul if he was smoking marijuana. He became 'very angry, yelled at her, grabbed her by the neck and started choking her'.

GEOFF SAYS: "As I and anyone else who smokes marijuana knows, one of the things that it doesn't do is make you violent. It has the opposite affect, that's why people smoke it.

I don't smoke anything and don't really know what effects such things have, but, saying he couldn't have got angry because marijuana has the opposite effect on a person would only be of relevance if it was proved that he was, indeed, smoking it at the time. d'oh.